After spending the last 6 years in research for my master's and doctoral degrees, I've found that Change Management has very little theory (believe it or not). Organizational Behavior (OB) and (to some extent) Organizational Psychology (OP) are the two domains that contribute to Change Management theory. On this page, I'll overview the recent trends first, then historic.
OB = Business school label
OP = All other schools label
OD = No real home in academia
Recent
Theory
Trend #1: Readiness
Nerina Jimmieson from the University of Queensland in Australia has led the way here attempting to tied Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior with Readiness for organizational change.
Trend #2: Individual perspective
Achilles Armenakis from Auburn has created a theoretical model viewing an individual's reaction to organizational change as the step in between initiation of the change (stimulus) and the consequences (response).
Achilles Armenakis from Auburn has created a theoretical model viewing an individual's reaction to organizational change as the step in between initiation of the change (stimulus) and the consequences (response).
Trend #3: Framework
Several recent texts use the Van de Ven & Poole taxonomy for categorizing organizational change theory into 1 of 4 categories:
Several recent texts use the Van de Ven & Poole taxonomy for categorizing organizational change theory into 1 of 4 categories:
Historical
Theory
We're all more familiar with
these theories. However, just because they are recognizable does not mean
they are correct. NONE of these are theories, per se. However, in
the absence of theory, they've served as the "base" thinking for
Change Management (OB).
#1 Lewin 3-step
#1 Lewin 3-step
Below is a screen grab from Lewin's original article. He was just describing the results from a group he was working with in an experiment on participative approaches to change. He intended it to be a label for group behavior, not an entire theory of change as it has grown into.
#2 Kubler-Ross
Speaking of models not intended for organizations, the death and dying model has stood the test of time, in part because of it's parallel to a team model listed below.
Speaking of models not intended for organizations, the death and dying model has stood the test of time, in part because of it's parallel to a team model listed below.
#3 Katzenbach
Katzenbach's team model caught on in the 90s. Several people create hybrids of this model combined with Kubler-Ross.
#4 Nadler-Tushman
The Nadler-Tushman model was created in the late 80s. It compares the magnitude of the change with the change relative to the environment/market.
The Nadler-Tushman model was created in the late 80s. It compares the magnitude of the change with the change relative to the environment/market.
Note: While this may not be an exhaustive list, it does cover most of the theories of change in OB and OP.
0 comments:
Post a Comment